Andrea,

if I understand your setup right then you have:

1) Server1.solaris member of REALM SOLARIS
2) Server2.solaris2 member of REALM SOLARIS2
3) user [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Now your krb5.conf on Server1 should be:

[libdefaults]
       default_realm =SOLARIS
        ...
[realms]
  SOLARIS = {
               kdc = colcascms
               admin_server = colcascms
               auth_to_local = RULE:[1:[EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL 
PROTECTED])s/@.*//
               auth_to_local = DEFAULT

        }
        SOLARIS2 = {
                kdc = colcascms2
                admin_server = colcascms2
        }
[domain_realm]
     .solaris = SOLARIS
     .solaris2 = SOLARIS2

and on Server2:

[libdefaults]
       default_realm =SOLARIS2
        ...
[realms]
  SOLARIS2 = {
               kdc = colcascms2
               admin_server = colcascms2
               auth_to_local = RULE:[1:[EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL 
PROTECTED])s/@.*//
               auth_to_local = DEFAULT

        }
        SOLARIS = {
                kdc = colcascms
                admin_server = colcascms
        }
[domain_realm]
     .solaris = SOLARIS
     .solaris2 = SOLARIS2


This would allow [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] to login to Server1 
and 
Server2 as local user andrea.

Or do I misunderstand your terminology of Master and Slave ?

Markus

"Andrea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi, i inserted the regular expression as you suggested, and on that
> machine (let's say this machine as MASTER) I can Single Sign On with
> both REALMS.
>
> However if  I use the same krb5.conf on an another machine (let's say
> SLAVE) setting the realm SOLARIS2 as default I can't Single Sign On on
> MASTER machine which is setted up for SOLARIS REALM as default. The
> strange thing lies in the fact that if on the SLAVE i use as default
> REALM SOLARIS then everything works fine, that is i can SSO with both
> REALMS.
>
> Any idea or suggestions?
>
>
> The krb5.conf of the master is the following:
> [libdefaults]
>        default_realm =SOLARIS
>        dns_lookup_kdc = false
>        dns_fallback  =  false
> # The following krb5.conf variables are only for MIT Kerberos.
>        krb4_config = /etc/krb.conf
>        krb4_realms = /etc/krb.realms
>        kdc_timesync = 1
>        ccache_type = 4
>        renewable = true
>        forwardable = true
>        proxiable = true
>
> [realms]
>        SOLARIS = {
>                kdc = colcascms
>                admin_server = colcascms
>                auth_to_local = RULE:[1:[EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL 
> PROTECTED])s/@.*//
>               auth_to_local = DEFAULT
>
>        }
>        SOLARIS2 = {
>                kdc = colcascms
>                admin_server = colcascms
>        }
>
>
> And the krb5.conf of the SLAVE is:
>
>
> [libdefaults]
>        default_realm =SOLARIS
>        dns_lookup_kdc = false
>        dns_fallback  =  false
> # The following krb5.conf variables are only for MIT Kerberos.
>        krb4_config = /etc/krb.conf
>        krb4_realms = /etc/krb.realms
>        kdc_timesync = 1
>        ccache_type = 4
>        renewable = true
>        forwardable = true
>        proxiable = true
>
>
> [realms]
>        SOLARIS = {
>                kdc = colcascms
>                admin_server = colcascms
>                auth_to_local = RULE:[1:[EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL 
> PROTECTED])s/@.*//
>                auth_to_local = DEFAULT
>
>        }
>        SOLARIS2 = {
>                kdc = colcascms
>                admin_server = colcascms
>                auth_to_local = RULE:[1:[EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL 
> PROTECTED])s/@.*//
>                auth_to_local = DEFAULT
>        }
>
>
> On 17 Mar, 21:44, "Markus Moeller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Andrea,
>>
>> a user [EMAIL PROTECTED] in not the same as a user [EMAIL PROTECTED] You 
>> need 
>> to
>> tell a server in domain SOLARIS that user [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the same as
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] by either using .k5login or use auth_to_local in krb5.conf
>> e.g.
>>
>> ..
>> [realms]
>>        SOLARIS = {
>>                kdc = ..
>> #
>> # map [EMAIL PROTECTED] to local user xxx
>> #
>>                auth_to_local = RULE:[1:[EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL 
>> PROTECTED])s/@.*//
>>                auth_to_local = DEFAULT
>>        }
>> ..
>>
>> This means you trust both domains using unique ids.
>>
>> Markus
>>
>> "Andrea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> > I just setted up a multi realm KDC on a linux machine.
>> > The 2 REALMS are named SOLARIS and SOLARIS2.
>> > I want to put a trust relationship between the two REALMS, so I did
>> > the following on each KDC:
>>
>> > addprinc -pw krbtgt/SOLARIS2 krbtgt/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > addprinc -pw krbtgt/SOLARIS krbtgt/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > In order to test cross realm authentication I tryed to single sign on
>> > into a machine based on SOLARIS realm, with a ticket of SOLARIS2. The
>> > SSO doesn't work, however if I run klist after trying   SSO, it
>> > yields:
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# klist
>> > Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0
>> > Default principal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > Valid starting     Expires            Service principal
>> > 03/17/08 04:09:13  03/17/08 15:49:13  krbtgt/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >        renew until 03/17/08 04:09:13
>> > 03/17/08 04:09:19  03/17/08 15:49:13  krbtgt/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >        renew until 03/17/08 04:09:13
>> > 03/17/08 04:09:19  03/17/08 15:49:13  host/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >        renew until 03/17/08 04:09:13
>>
>> > It seems that the cross realm authentication works, but the SSO no.
>>
>> > I can make the system successfully works inserting the .k5login file
>> > into the home directory of the user who is attempting to SSO on the
>> > machine with a ticket of SOLARIS2 REALM.
>>
>> > I want to ask to you:
>>
>> > Am I missing something on the configuration?
>> > Is necessary to set up for each user on the system a .k5login?
>> > Is it possible to avoid using the .k5login?
>>
>> > Thanks in advance!
>>
>> > best regards,
>> > Andrea
>> > ________________________________________________
>> > Kerberos mailing list           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
>
> ________________________________________________
> Kerberos mailing list           [email protected]
> https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
> 


________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list           [email protected]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos

Reply via email to