>>>>> "res" == Richard E Silverman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>> "petesea" == petesea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
petesea> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> The v_t_m version could use either the Microsoft SSPI, or the MIT
>>> GSSAPI as implemented bi the MIT gssapi32.dll. The new PuTTY only
>>> does SSPI so there are some implications if you are trying to use
>>> this from a non-windows domain machine. (But runas could be used.)
petesea> That's unfortunate, I wish they would implement both methods.
petesea> I also wish they would implement GSSAPI Key Exchange, to
petesea> avoid the need to maintain host keys on the client. I
petesea> haven't found any implementation of PuTTY that supports both
petesea> MIT GSSAPI and GSSAPI Key Exchange.
res> http://rc.quest.com/topics/PuTTY/
Oops, you said *MIT* GSSAPI. Indeed. FYI, in the commercial world,
SecureCRT does this.
res> -- Richard Silverman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Richard Silverman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list [email protected]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
