I think, from a programming standpoint, I want the core krb5 version that's in patchlevel.h. That's the thing that changes with the API and features and whatnot (ignoring any platform patches, which I guess is not really a safe thing to ignore, given that I just spent 10 hours wading through the rpm patches for RHEL and getting things building and installed from latest source, but anyway).
Chris On 2011/07/26 05:33, Greg Hudson wrote: > On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 08:28 -0400, Chris Hecker wrote: >> Hmm, on windows it just returns "Kerberos for Windows", while on linux >> it returns "Kerberos 5 version 1.9.1". > > Yeah, on Windows we use a different and overlapping build system, and > it's not smart enough to put the version number there. Also, > historically our Windows releases have used a different version > numbering scheme (the last one was Kerberos for Windows 3.2.2, based on > krb5 1.6), so it's not even clear which version to put there. > > > ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
