Dear All, Do you know whether the master key is cached somehow?
I have done the thing below: 0] the main characters are sv-u1404-02 is my kerberos master sv-u1404 is my kerberos slave 1] on the kerberos slave: root@sv-u1404:/etc/krb5kdc# service krb5-admin-server stop service krb5-kdc stop mv stash stash.safe 2] on the kerberos master: I have created a new principal, i.e. kadmin: listprincs *ciao* host/[email protected] root@sv-u1404-02:~# /usr/sbin/kprop -f ~/temp/slave_datatrans sv-u1404 Database propagation to sv-u1404: SUCCEEDED 3] back on the keberos slave: root@sv-u1404:/etc/krb5kdc# mv stash.safe stash (I need to do that, otherwise the daemon does not start) root@sv-u1404:/etc/krb5kdc# service krb5-admin-server start root@sv-u1404:/etc/krb5kdc# kadmin.local kadmin.local: listprincs *ciao* host/[email protected] The update of the db from my master sv-u1404-02 to my slave sv-u1404 was successful... Is it the normal behaviour? I thought you should have a valid stash file on place to access the database on the slave. Maybe not? Or there is some kind of caching? Do you know how it works? Thank you in advance. All the best, Giuseppe ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
