On 2/23/23 12:34, Sam Hartman wrote:
I also think that the simple client referred to in the subject has a
bunch of anti-patterns.
As an example, I don't think it integrity protects or encrypts its
exchanges
I think appl/simple actually does protect messages but appl/sample does not.
It looks like the uses of krb5_gen_portaddr() and krb5_gen_replay_name()
in sim_client.c don't do anything after commit
dcb853ac32779b173f39e19c0f24b0087de85771 so they can be removed (I just
didn't realize it at the time).
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list [email protected]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
