Le 20/07/15 08:22, Zheng, Kai a écrit : > I got it, thanks for the detailed explanation. I had already corrected the > codes and it works fine now. I guess the performance overhead may be incurred > by the fragment handling. > > # Run complete. Total time: 00:00:29 > > Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units > KrbCodecBenchmark.decodeWithApacheDS avgt 10 10702.118 ± 1475.804 ns/op > KrbCodecBenchmark.decodeWithKerby avgt 10 5833.663 ± 168.466 > ns/op > > By the way, in the following I will work out benchmarks for back ends and the > KDC server, using the JMH framework like above.
Good ! As expected, and as proven months ago, the Kerby codec is faster than the ApacheDS's one. This is a great result !
