Le 04/01/16 11:40, Zheng, Kai a écrit : > Hi Emmanuel, > > I understand your review comments and actually they're very insightful. I may > be a little nervous but I did have to convey the current situation the codes > in so that you can aware it why I would insist on some points for myself. > Some of the codes are still initial and lacking something, that does not mean > we shouldn't the project. As you may understand, a project may be released > out with some features still in its experimental status unless the feature > itself isn't claimed to be available. Kerberos contains quite a few > extensions and updates since 4210, as you may be noted, we're incrementally > implementing them one by one, and some of them may come across some RCs or > even formal releases. So all in all, please don't be surprised when you see > still immature codes when you're doing the great review. Thanks.
No worry at all. I see no reason to block a release because there is something missing (we do that all the time...). I just wanted to stress out the fact that it's important to convey teh right message to our users. This is a disucssion we must have asside this thread : what version scheme should we use ?
