Hi Colm, Thanks for taking time to review. >a) [WARNING] 'dependencies.dependency.version' for org.json:json:jar is either >LATEST or RELEASE (both of them are being deprecated) @ >org.apache.kerby:has-tool:[unknown-version], >/home/colm/src/apache/directory-kerby/kerby-tool/has-tool/pom.xml, line 48, >column 22
I've removed the org.json dependency. >b) Should Hadoop 3.0.0 be updated to 3.0.3? >Does the "HAS project" build a distribution? If so have you followed the steps >to include the license/copyright issues as per the existing Kerby >distributions? The Hadoop version has been upgraded to 3.0.3. "HAS project" will build a distribution, here is the license folder： https://github.com/apache/directory-kerby/tree/trunk/kerby-dist/has-dist/licenses Thanks, Jiajia -----Original Message----- From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 8:49 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Kerby 2.0.0 OK thanks, give me a few days to review it. Two issues I noticed: a) [WARNING] 'dependencies.dependency.version' for org.json:json:jar is either LATEST or RELEASE (both of them are being deprecated) @ org.apache.kerby:has-tool:[unknown-version], /home/colm/src/apache/directory-kerby/kerby-tool/has-tool/pom.xml, line 48, column 22 b) Should Hadoop 3.0.0 be updated to 3.0.3? Does the "HAS project" build a distribution? If so have you followed the steps to include the license/copyright issues as per the existing Kerby distributions? Colm. On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 8:02 AM, Li, Jiajia <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > We have finished all the taskes for Kerby major release(2.0.0), and > here is the "getting started" for HAS: > https://github.com/apache/directory-kerby/blob/trunk/ > has-project/docs/has-start.md > > > Thanks, > Jiajia > > -----Original Message----- > From: Li, Jiajia [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 9:11 AM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: Kerby 2.0.0 > > >> Yes that seems reasonable to me. I think the documentation part is > >> critical > >> - we need some "getting started" type tutorials to explain how to > >> use > the product. > > Agree with you, it's also in our plan. > > Regards, > Jiajia > > -----Original Message----- > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 7:02 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Kerby 2.0.0 > > Yes that seems reasonable to me. I think the documentation part is > critical > - we need some "getting started" type tutorials to explain how to use > the product. > > Colm. > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Li, Jiajia <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > We discussed "Merge HAS to Apache Kerby" in November last year. We > > started the merging process in DIRKRB-671(https://issues. > > apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-671) and we also added some new > > features(such as MySQL plugin) during this process. Now the merging > > process is coming to an end, we're thinking about a new Kerby major > > release(2.0.0) with HAS after completing the following tasks: > > > > 1. We added MySQL plugin as the default plugin, it's better to add > > more plugins(such as LDAP plugin). > > 2. The remote admin through REST API should support more commands. > > 3. Add more documents > > 4. Testing > > > > How do you think about this? > > > > > > Regards, > > Jiajia > > > > > > -- > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > Talend Community Coder > http://coders.talend.com > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
