Mick Semb Wever wrote: >> Committed revision 14393. >> > > Should we keep a standard of writing revisions number as rXXXX, eg > r14393 > > http://www.producingoss.com/en/growth.html#codifying-traditio I'm not much of a committer to the code, but I have done a bit of version control and report extraction from huge software repositories. Anything that helps to uniquely identify something is generally a Good thing. Tagging a revision with rXXXX sounds very sensible. Without it it's just another number.
-- Jon Ø. Kvebæk, Operations Manager Schibsted Søk AS / sesam.no Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Phone: +47 99219829 _______________________________________________ Kernel-development mailing list [email protected] http://sesat.no/mailman/listinfo/kernel-development
