Sorry for the lag on this issue. Timo, while the added hooks are useful, they don't for the time being obviate the need for the larger hammer of the sysctl, so we'd still like to keep the referred to patch available, until we are forced to make a choice if and when upstream drops the sysctl entirely.
Po-Hsu, if it's easier for tracking for it to be a separate bug report, that's fine. Am hoping ot have more time soon to focus on qa-r-t issues when they come up. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-5.6 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879339 Title: test_310_config_security_perf_events_restrict / test_400_refcount_config in ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security failed on F-OEM-5.6 Status in QA Regression Testing: Fix Released Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: New Status in linux-oem-5.6 package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: ====================================================================== FAIL: test_310_config_security_perf_events_restrict (__main__.KernelSecurityConfigTest) Ensure CONFIG_SECURITY_PERF_EVENTS_RESTRICT is set ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "./test-kernel-security.py", line 2704, in test_310_config_security_perf_events_restrict self.assertKernelConfig(config_name, expected) File "./test-kernel-security.py", line 214, in assertKernelConfig self.assertKernelConfigSet(name) File "./test-kernel-security.py", line 201, in assertKernelConfigSet '%s option was expected to be set in the kernel config' % name) AssertionError: SECURITY_PERF_EVENTS_RESTRICT option was expected to be set in the kernel config ====================================================================== FAIL: test_400_refcount_config (__main__.KernelSecurityConfigTest) Ensure kernel refcount protections are enabled ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "./test-kernel-security.py", line 2817, in test_400_refcount_config self.assertKernelConfig(config_name, expected) File "./test-kernel-security.py", line 214, in assertKernelConfig self.assertKernelConfigSet(name) File "./test-kernel-security.py", line 201, in assertKernelConfigSet '%s option was expected to be set in the kernel config' % name) AssertionError: ARCH_HAS_REFCOUNT option was expected to be set in the kernel config ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: linux-image-5.6.0-1010-oem 5.6.0-1010.10 ProcVersionSignature: User Name 5.6.0-1010.10-oem 5.6.8 Uname: Linux 5.6.0-1010-oem x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip Date: Mon May 18 14:44:11 2020 ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set> LANG=C.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: linux-signed-oem-5.6 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qa-regression-testing/+bug/1879339/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
