** Description changed: Dear Developers and maintainers, trying not to make a big fuzz about it: Let me just quote https://bugs.launchpad.net/baltix/+bug/930447/comments/97 from 2012-06-05: - > The non-PAE version of the Linux kernel will be dropped completely - following the 12.04 release. + > The non-PAE version of the Linux kernel will be dropped completely + > following the 12.04 release. - Pls correct me and mark as invalid, if Ubuntu doesnt have to follow - naming conventions given on Linux-Kernel. + Pls correct me and mark as invalid, if Ubuntu doesn't have to follow + naming conventions given on the Linux-Kernel. Trying to find appropiate information in the package change-log: linux-meta (3.4.0.1.1) quantal; urgency=low * Open Quantal Quetzal 12.10 * Temporarily disable LBM * Remove non-PAE i386 references -- mail adress hid...@canonical.com> Wed, 02 May 2012 06:21:45 -0700 - Pls clarify this and correct Ubuntus Kernel-nming on i386 package if - appropriate + Pls clarify this and correct Ubuntus Kernel-naming on i386 package if + appropriate. Personally I think Linus wouldn't smile, even though if I thought the index-finger to Nvidia was a bit to rough. Personally I think this bug has security-potential. Thanks for helping to make Ubuntu better every day.
** Description changed: Dear Developers and maintainers, trying not to make a big fuzz about it: Let me just quote https://bugs.launchpad.net/baltix/+bug/930447/comments/97 from - 2012-06-05: + 2012-06-05 (referencing the release-notes on 12.04.2): - > The non-PAE version of the Linux kernel will be dropped completely + > The non-PAE version of the Linux kernel will be dropped completely > following the 12.04 release. Pls correct me and mark as invalid, if Ubuntu doesn't have to follow naming conventions given on the Linux-Kernel. Trying to find appropiate information in the package change-log: linux-meta (3.4.0.1.1) quantal; urgency=low * Open Quantal Quetzal 12.10 * Temporarily disable LBM * Remove non-PAE i386 references -- mail adress hid...@canonical.com> Wed, 02 May 2012 06:21:45 -0700 Pls clarify this and correct Ubuntus Kernel-naming on i386 package if appropriate. Personally I think Linus wouldn't smile, even though if I thought the index-finger to Nvidia was a bit to rough. Personally I think this bug has security-potential. Thanks for helping to make Ubuntu better every day. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1214462 Title: Kernel Description doesn't explain its a PAE-Kernel _ since 3.4.0.1.1 _ Linus would not smile _. Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Dear Developers and maintainers, trying not to make a big fuzz about it: Let me just quote https://bugs.launchpad.net/baltix/+bug/930447/comments/97 from 2012-06-05 (referencing the release-notes on 12.04.2): > The non-PAE version of the Linux kernel will be dropped completely > following the 12.04 release. Pls correct me and mark as invalid, if Ubuntu doesn't have to follow naming conventions given on the Linux-Kernel. Trying to find appropiate information in the package change-log: linux-meta (3.4.0.1.1) quantal; urgency=low * Open Quantal Quetzal 12.10 * Temporarily disable LBM * Remove non-PAE i386 references -- mail adress hid...@canonical.com> Wed, 02 May 2012 06:21:45 -0700 Pls clarify this and correct Ubuntus Kernel-naming on i386 package if appropriate. Personally I think Linus wouldn't smile, even though if I thought the index-finger to Nvidia was a bit to rough. Personally I think this bug has security-potential. Thanks for helping to make Ubuntu better every day. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1214462/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
