A few comments and questions: 1. Should we include the hv_sock module as built-in or keep it as a module?
2. It's better to try to reserve in upstream the address family number (AF_HYPERV) to avoid conflicts with future rebases and problems with userspace. 3. It seems that net/core/sock.c also needs to be updated with AF_HYPERV. I can include those changes on the patch that I will submit to our mailing list. But I'd like to have that patch reviewed but Microsoft. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1690196 Title: [Hyper-V][SAUCE] hv_sock for 4.10 Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in linux source package in Zesty: Triaged Bug description: Please include the latest version of Hyper-V Sockets (hv_sock) for the 4.10 kernel against the Azure kernel. This is SAUCE as this has not yet been submitted or accepted upstream in this form. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1690196/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
