** Changed in: makedumpfile (Ubuntu Xenial)
       Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: makedumpfile (Ubuntu Xenial)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf)

** Description changed:

- $ ls arch/
- arm.c  ia64.c  ppc.c  ppc64.c  s390x.c  x86.c  x86_64.c
+ [Impact]
+ kdump-tools is not installable on arm64 because it depends on makedumpfile, 
which is not currently built on arm64. Adding arm64 to the Architecture list in 
debian/control is all that is needed for it to build successfully.
+ 
+ That said, xenial's version was too old to support filtering kdump-
+ enabled xenial kernels (>= 4.10.0). So, this doesn't actually produce a
+ *useful* makedumpfile, but does allow kdump-tools to be installed, which
+ unblocks collection of (unfiltered) crash dump files.
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ On an arm64 system:
+  sudo apt install kdump-tools
+ 
+ [Regression Risk]
+ The only change here is to make a binary package available on arm64 that 
previously was not - regression risk to existing architectures should therefore 
be negligible.
+ 
+ Note: Enabling a binary package for an architecture where it's known not
+ to be useful - at last on it's own - is obviously non-ideal. I
+ considered other options, but they all seem to add unnecessary
+ regression risk:
+ 
+ - Demoting the "Depends:" to a "Recommends:". I actually think we should
+ do this going forward (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
+ bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865701), but this would be a change in behavior to
+ people who may install kdump-tools w/ Recommends-disabled and expect to
+ stil get makedumpfile.
+ 
+ - Demoting only on arm64: This isn't possible unless we switch kdump-
+ tools from Binary: any to Binary: all. I also think there are good
+ reasons to do that in future releases (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
+ bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=863858), but it seems overkill for just enabling
+ arm64.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to makedumpfile in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1238110

Title:
  makedumpfile needs porting for AArch64

Status in Linaro AArch64 cross-distro work:
  New
Status in makedumpfile package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in makedumpfile source package in Xenial:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  kdump-tools is not installable on arm64 because it depends on makedumpfile, 
which is not currently built on arm64. Adding arm64 to the Architecture list in 
debian/control is all that is needed for it to build successfully.

  That said, xenial's version was too old to support filtering kdump-
  enabled xenial kernels (>= 4.10.0). So, this doesn't actually produce
  a *useful* makedumpfile, but does allow kdump-tools to be installed,
  which unblocks collection of (unfiltered) crash dump files.

  [Test Case]
  On an arm64 system:
   sudo apt install kdump-tools

  [Regression Risk]
  The only change here is to make a binary package available on arm64 that 
previously was not - regression risk to existing architectures should therefore 
be negligible.

  Note: Enabling a binary package for an architecture where it's known
  not to be useful - at last on it's own - is obviously non-ideal. I
  considered other options, but they all seem to add unnecessary
  regression risk:

  - Demoting the "Depends:" to a "Recommends:". I actually think we
  should do this going forward (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
  bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865701), but this would be a change in behavior
  to people who may install kdump-tools w/ Recommends-disabled and
  expect to stil get makedumpfile.

  - Demoting only on arm64: This isn't possible unless we switch kdump-
  tools from Binary: any to Binary: all. I also think there are good
  reasons to do that in future releases (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
  bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=863858), but it seems overkill for just enabling
  arm64.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1238110/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to