This all for xenial ADT tests.

** Tags added: xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-aws in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1721558

Title:
  ubuntu-regression-suite fails in xenial

Status in linux-aws package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in linux-azure package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in linux-gcp package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in linux-gke package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in linux-hwe package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in linux-hwe-edge package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in linux-kvm package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in linux-aws source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in linux-azure source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in linux-gcp source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in linux-gke source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in linux-hwe source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in linux-hwe-edge source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in linux-kvm source package in Xenial:
  New

Bug description:
  ubuntu-regression-suite fails in xenial

  autopkgtest [22:34:48]: test ubuntu-regression-suite: [-----------------------
  Source Package Version: 4.4.0-1035.44
  Running Kernel Version: 4.4.0-96.119
  ERROR: running version does not match source package

  Please note autopkgtests have quite elaborate setup for the kernels,
  thus I'm guessing that some of the setup is not done right, and the
  VMs are still running generic kernel instead of customized kernel.

  Maybe a reboot mark is needed in the ubuntu-regression-suite case to
  reboot the system if Source != Running. And if that doesn't help
  either, then fail the test?

  This affects a few packages which all trip up ADT testing whenever I
  SRU systemd.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-aws/+bug/1721558/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to