Public bug reported:

SRU Justification

Impact: Shiftfs does not mark it's slab cache as reclaimable. While this
is not a big deal it is not nice to the kernel in general. The shiftfs
cache is not so important that it can't be reclaimed.

Regression Potential: Limited to shiftfs. This patch has been tested for
multiple days and has not caused any regressions.

Test Case:
Open a lot of files in shiftfs to get them into the cache and then cause memory 
pressure via e.g. stress-ng and see if the shiftfs cache shrinks.

Target Kernels: All LTS kernels with shiftfs support.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
     Assignee: Christian Brauner (cbrauner)
         Status: In Progress

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Brauner (cbrauner)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842059

Title:
  shiftfs: mark kmem_cache as reclaimable

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  Impact: Shiftfs does not mark it's slab cache as reclaimable. While
  this is not a big deal it is not nice to the kernel in general. The
  shiftfs cache is not so important that it can't be reclaimed.

  Regression Potential: Limited to shiftfs. This patch has been tested
  for multiple days and has not caused any regressions.

  Test Case:
  Open a lot of files in shiftfs to get them into the cache and then cause 
memory pressure via e.g. stress-ng and see if the shiftfs cache shrinks.

  Target Kernels: All LTS kernels with shiftfs support.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1842059/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to