Hello Alex, or anyone else affected,

Accepted dkms into disco-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkms/2.6.1-4ubuntu2.5
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from
verification-needed-disco to verification-done-disco. If it does not fix
the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag
to verification-failed-disco. In either case, without details of your
testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to dkms in Ubuntu.

  dkms script is missing function find_module

Status in DKMS:
Status in dkms package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in dkms source package in Bionic:
  Fix Released
Status in dkms source package in Disco:
  Fix Committed
Status in dkms source package in Eoan:
  Fix Committed
Status in dkms source package in Focal:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  update for SRU process:
  1. dkms script is missing function find_module
  2. priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force". #89  

  [Test case]
  install the dkms which already patched (also can be found in my ppa[1])
  1. install a dkms which for a kernel module system already installed.
  e.g. ath10k of my testing ppa : [1] 
  1.1. the dkms can be installed well.

  2. install a dkms which has OBSOLETE_BY and FORCE
  e.g.ath10k of my testing ppa : [1] (source code in [2])
   - the target dkms defined OBSOLETE_BY and FORCE
   - user install dkms on a system which installed kernel version less than 
OBSOLETE_BY and another kernel higher than OBSOLETE_BY
   - the dkms can be installed well.

  [Regression potential]
  medium as it touched the version sanity. This change correct the code logic 
and land one more change from upstream as well.
  The logic has been verified by #5 and me.

  Building a kernel module using dkms in Linux Mint 19.1 shows the following 

  Running module version sanity check.
  /usr/sbin/dkms: Zeile 784: find_module: Befehl nicht gefunden
  modinfo: ERROR: missing module or filename.

  Checking the file the function is indeed missing and another user
  confirmed, that it was removed at some point:

  Possible solution: Readd

      # tree = $1
      # module = $2
      find "$1" -name "$2$module_uncompressed_suffix" -o -name 
"$2$module_suffix" -type f
      return $?

  as found in https://github.com/dell/dkms/blob/master/dkms

To manage notifications about this bug go to:

Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to