This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves
the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the
results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-
focal' to 'verification-done-focal'. If the problem still exists, change
the tag 'verification-needed-focal' to 'verification-failed-focal'.

If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.

See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879704

Title:
  [UBUNTU 20.04] s390x/pci: fix linking between PF and VF for
  multifunction devices

Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Groovy:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  SRU Justification:
  ==================

  [Impact]

  * It's currently not possible on s390x to verify the relationships
  between PFs and VFs of network interfaces (neither natively nor in
  libvirt).

  * So s390x currently behaves differently here compared to other
  architectures, but shouldn't, since this is needed for proper
  management.

  * The creation of not only the sysfs, but also the in-kernel link
  (struct pci_dev->physfn), solves this and on top allows the use of a
  common code path for disabling/shutdown of PFs.

  * This code path is right now fenced off by the struct
  pci_dev->no_vf_scan flag of which s390x is currently the only user.

  * This allows to gracefully and orderly shutdown VFs associated with a
  PF as triggered by '/sys/bus/pci/devices/<some_pf>/sriov_numvfs'

  * Previously this could leave the card in an unresponsive error state.

  [Fix]

  * a1ceea67f2e5b73cebd456e7fb463b3052bc6344 a1ceea67f2e5 "PCI/IOV:
  Introduce pci_iov_sysfs_link() function"

  * e5794cf1a270d813a5b9373a6876487d4d154195 e5794cf1a270 "s390/pci:
  create links between PFs and VFs"

  [Test Case]

  * Setup an s390x LPAR with at least one SR-IOV card and assign PF and
  VFs to that system.

  * Determine if a device is a virtual function: for other architectures
  this is currently available in the file 'physfn' which is a link to
  the parent PF's device.

  * Determine virtual functions of a physical function: for other
  architectures this is currently available as 'virtfn{index}' links
  under the PF device's directory.

  * Determine the physical function of a virtual function: on x86 this
  is currently available in the file 'physfn' which is a link to the
  parent PF.

  * This verification needs to be done by IBM on a system with SR-IOV
  (PCI-based) hardware.

  [Regression Potential]

  * There is a certain regression risk with having code changes in the PCI/IOV 
space,
    even is they are limited, especially is the patches touche common code.

  * The changes in pci.h are very minimal, and the iov.c changes are
  traceable, too. All other modifications are s390x specific.

  * Nevertheless, it could be that PCI hardware get harmed, here
  especially (SR-)IOV hardware.

  * The patches got cross-company verified (IBM and Google).

  * They were brought upstream and are currently tagged with 20200521,
  and are planned to be included in 5.8.

  * A patched kernel was created based on a LP PPA and successfully
  tested by IBM.

  [Other]

  * Since the fix/patch is planned to be included in kernel v5.8, it
  will later automatically land in groovy.

  * But because groovy is not there yet (5.8 is not yet out), this SRU
  got requested for focal and groovy.

  * This SRU depends on the SRU from LP 1874056, and this has already two ACKs.
    So LP 1874056 needs to be applied before this one!
  __________

  As with other architectures, we must be able on s390x to verify the
  following relationships between PFs and VFs for proper management
  (including by libvirt) of network interfaces:

  1. Determine if a device is a virtual function: for other architectures this 
is currently available in the file `physfn` which is a link to the parent PF's 
device.
  2. Determine virtual functions of a physical function: for other 
architectures this is currently available as `virtfn{index}` links under the PF 
device's directory.
  3. Determine the physical function of a virtual function: on x86 this is 
currently available in the file `physfn` which is a link to the parent PF

  More details for the already existing parameters mentioned above can
  be found here: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/ABI/testing
  /sysfs-bus-pci

  Moreover creating not just the sysfs but also the in-kernel link
  (struct pci_dev->physfn) also allows us to use the common code path
  for disabling/shutdown of PFs.
  This code path is currently fenced off by the
  struct pci_dev->no_vf_scan flag of which s390 is currently the only user.

  This in turn allows for a graceful and orderly shutdown of VFs
  associated with a VF as triggered by:

  echo 0 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/<some_pf>/sriov_numvfs

  Previously this could leave the card in an unresponsive error state.

  The patches for this have been discussed and Acked-by the
  responsible upstream maintainer here:

  [RFC 0/2] Enable PF-VF linking with pdev->no_vf_scan (s390)
  
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20200506154139.90609-1-schne...@linux.ibm.com/

  [RFC 1/2] PCI/IOV: Introduce pci_iov_sysfs_link() function
  
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20200506154139.90609-2-schne...@linux.ibm.com/

  [RFC 2/2] s390/pci: create links between PFs and VFs
  
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20200506154139.90609-2-schne...@linux.ibm.com/

  They are currently queued to be posted to the public s390 Kernel
  repository and linux-next / 5.8.
  These depend on the previous multi-function/enumeration rework.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1879704/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to