This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves
the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the
results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-
bionic' to 'verification-done-bionic'. If the problem still exists,
change the tag 'verification-needed-bionic' to 'verification-failed-
bionic'.

If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.

See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882478

Title:
  smpboot: don't call topology_sane() when Sub-NUMA-Clustering is
  enabled

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882478

  [Impact]

  Intel Skylake server processors and onward have a different Last Level
  Cache (LLC) topology than earlier processors, and such processors have
  a new feature called Sub-NUMA-Clustering (SNC) which is similar to the
  existing Cluster-On-Die (CoD) feature earlier server processors has.

  Sub-NUMA-Clustering divides the system into two "slices", each of
  which are allocated half the CPU cores, half the Last Level Cache and
  one memory controller. Each slice is enumerated as a NUMA node.

  The difference between Sub-NUMA-Clustering and Cluster-On-Die is how
  the Last Level Cache is exposed to each NUMA node. CoD had the same
  cache line present in each half of the LLC. In SNC, each cache line is
  only present in its respective slice. Because of this, the semantics
  around accessing LLC changes, with a process accessing NUMA-local
  memory only seeing half the LLC capacity.

  On systems with Sub-NUMA-Clustering enabled, on the Xenial 4.4 and
  Bionic 4.15 kernels we see the following oops during NUMA node
  enumeration:

  .... node #0, CPUs: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6
  .... node #1, CPUs: #7
  sched: CPU #7's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node! [node: 1 != 0]. 
Ignoring dependency.
  WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 0 at 
/build/linux-hwe-F5opqf/linux-hwe-4.15.0/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:375 
topology_sane.isra.4+0x6c/0x70
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Not tainted 4.15.0-47-generic #50~16.04.1-Ubuntu
  Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL360 Gen10/ProLiant DL360 Gen10, BIOS U32 
10/02/2018
  RIP: 0010:topology_sane.isra.4+0x6c/0x70
  Call Trace:
  set_cpu_sibling_map+0x153/0x540
  start_secondary+0xb2/0x200
  secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0
  #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13
  .... node #0, CPUs: #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20
  .... node #1, CPUs: #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27
  smp: Brought up 2 nodes, 28 CPUs

  This was with a Intel Xeon Gold 5120 CPU on a HP DL360 Gen10.

  The oops happens because topology_sane() checks to see if the Last
  Level Cache line matches across different CPUs, which it no longer
  does.

  [Fix]

  The fix comes in the form of the following upstream commit, which
  landed in Linux 4.17:

  commit 1340ccfa9a9afefdbab90d7935d4ed19817e37c2
  Author: Alison Schofield <alison.schofi...@intel.com>
  Date: Fri Apr 6 17:21:30 2018 -0700
  Subject: x86,sched: Allow topologies where NUMA nodes share an LLC
  Link: 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/1340ccfa9a9afefdbab90d7935d4ed19817e37c2

  The commit adds a check for this particular family of Intel
  processors, and if the CPU family matches, it simply skips the check
  to topology_sane().

  The commit needs minor backports to Xenial 4.4 and Bionic 4.15, with
  the only remarks being re-arranging #includes and small context
  fixups.

  [Testcase]

  Unfortunately, this is hardware specific. To test this, you need a
  Intel Skylake server processor which supports Sub-NUMA-Clustering.

  We have a customer with a Intel Xeon Gold 5120 CPU on a HP DL360 Gen10
  that has successfully tested the below test kernels, with good
  results.

  Xenial 4.4 ppa:
  https://launchpad.net/~mruffell/+archive/ubuntu/sf280048-test-ga

  Xenial 4.15 HWE ppa:
  https://launchpad.net/~mruffell/+archive/ubuntu/sf280048-test-hwe

  Running the test kernel, the oops does not reproduce:

  smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
  x86: Booting SMP configuration:
  .... node #0, CPUs: #1
  NMI watchdog: Enabled. Permanently consumes one hw-PMU counter.
  #2 #3 #4 #5 #6
  .... node #1, CPUs: #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13
  .... node #0, CPUs: #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20
  .... node #1, CPUs: #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27
  smp: Brought up 2 nodes, 28 CPUs
  smpboot: Max logical packages: 1
  smpboot: Total of 28 processors activated

  [Regression Potential]

  The commit modifies a small section of smpboot code, which every
  machine will execute on boot. The majority of the commit breaks up a
  large if statement into smaller blocks than it was previously, and
  adds an extra if statement to check for a specific processor family.

  If a regression were to occur, some machines would or would not make
  their calls to topology_sane(), which in the worst case, would result
  in a oops message and slightly degraded performance. The system would
  still function normally.

  The commit has been present since 4.17-rc2 and is present in Eoan and
  Focal. There are no fixup commits, and no additional processor
  families have been added since.

  Because of the small re-arrangement in logic, and the addition of a
  processor family check, these changes are fairly minor, and I don't
  think it will cause any regressions.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1882478/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to