Seeing how regression-prone the changes to the audio stack are, I'm starting to think that maybe we should put additional requirements to the SRU test cases. Maybe we should always check all the possible input combinations for such SRUs? I'll have to think about it a bit.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-ucm-conf in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895669 Title: Add more support to Lenovo ThinkStation P620 Status in HWE Next: New Status in OEM Priority Project: New Status in alsa-ucm-conf package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in alsa-ucm-conf source package in Focal: Fix Released Status in alsa-ucm-conf source package in Groovy: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] After upgrading the audio device firmware and doing more testing, we found some new audio issue on Lenovo P620: 1) Rear mic doesn't work. 2) Front and rear mic/line-in don't use hardware gain to control capture volume. [Fix] For 1), add proper PCM stream assignment to the rear microphone. For 2), add MixerElem to let alsa-lib and PulseAudio to pick correct mixer to change HW gain. [Test] With the new UCM applied, rear mic starts to work, and PulseAudio can control the hardware gain. [Regression Potential] The system hasn't hit the market so there's no chance to regression any system in the wild. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1895669/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
