This bug was fixed in the package linux-signed - 5.8.0-36.40+21.04.1

---------------
linux-signed (5.8.0-36.40+21.04.1) hirsute; urgency=medium

  * Master version: 5.8.0-36.40+21.04.1

 -- Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <[email protected]>  Thu, 07 Jan
2021 12:01:04 +0100

** Changed in: linux-signed (Ubuntu)
       Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules (Ubuntu)
       Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2021-1052

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2021-1053

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-signed in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904578

Title:
  Update linux-signed/linux-restricted-modules for forward port suffixes

Status in linux-restricted-modules package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-signed package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Impact: When forward-porting kernels we add a +NN.NN.N suffix to the
  package version. We also append +N to the version for respins of
  linux-signed and linux-restricted-modules, which gets stripped to
  determine the version of kernel packages to use in the Build-Depends.
  The regex which strips +N does not do end-of-line matching, and so it
  ends up stripping part of the forward-port suffix, causing the wrong
  version to be placed in the Build-Depends.

  Fix: Add end-of-line matching to the regex which strips the +N from
  the version string, ensuring that this pattern is not stripped from
  elsewhere in the version.

  Test Case: Run 'fakeroot debian/rules clean' in a signed/l-r-m tree
  for a forward-port kernel and inspect debian/control. Without end-of-
  line matching the +NN part of +NN.NN.N is stripped from the versions
  in Build-Depends. With end-of-line matching it is not stripped.

  Regression Potential: Any problems will result in incorrect versions
  placed in the Build-Depends. The most likely result is that this is a
  package version which does not exist, so the packages fail to build
  due to missing dependencies. It is very unlikely that an incorrect but
  valid package version in the Build-Depends, but if this did happen the
  packages could successfully build against the wrong kernel. This would
  be noticed quickly in testing as modules from linux-modules will fail
  to load with the packages produced from the linux-signed build.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-restricted-modules/+bug/1904578/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to