When comparing the Focal 5.4 generic AMD64 kernel test output and Focal
5.4 KVM AMD64 kernel test output, you can see the generic kernel will
pass with:

 PASS: clflush (present)
 PASS: sfence (present)
 PASS: lfence (present)
 PASS: mfence (present)
 PASS: clflushopt (ABSENT)
 PASS: clwb (ABSENT)
 PASS: invalid clwb
 PASS: pcommit (ABSENT)
 SUMMARY: 8 tests
 PASS memory (8 tests)

Instead the KVM kernel will fail with:
 FAIL: clflushopt (ABSENT)
 FAIL: clwb (ABSENT)

I wonder what's the difference here.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oracle in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831449

Title:
  memory in ubuntu_kvm_unit_tests fails (clflushopt / clwb ABSENT)

Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
  Triaged
Status in linux-kvm package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in linux-oracle package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
   FAIL: clflushopt (ABSENT)
   FAIL: clwb (ABSENT)

  Test output:

  Running 
'/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/tmp/ubuntu_kvm_unit_tests/src/kvm-unit-tests/tests/memory'
   BUILD_HEAD=32db322d
   timeout -k 1s --foreground 90s /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 --no-reboot 
-nodefaults -device pc-testdev -device isa-debug-exit,iobase=0xf4,iosize=0x4 
-vnc none -serial stdio -device pci-testdev -machine accel=kvm -kernel 
/tmp/tmp.SOyUkPCNxP -smp 1 -cpu max # -initrd /tmp/tmp.DiAWwvk2jC
   enabling apic
   PASS: clflush (present)
   PASS: sfence (present)
   PASS: lfence (present)
   PASS: mfence (present)
   FAIL: clflushopt (ABSENT)
   FAIL: clwb (ABSENT)
   PASS: invalid clwb
   PASS: pcommit (ABSENT)
   SUMMARY: 8 tests, 2 unexpected failures
   FAIL memory (8 tests, 2 unexpected failures)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1831449/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to