** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Kinetic) Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-5.14 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975691 Title: Remove SAUCE patches from test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh in net of ubuntu_kernel_selftests Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: In Progress Status in linux package in Ubuntu: In Progress Status in linux-oem-5.14 package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in linux-oem-5.17 package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in linux source package in Focal: In Progress Status in linux-oem-5.14 source package in Focal: In Progress Status in linux-oem-5.17 source package in Focal: Invalid Status in linux source package in Impish: In Progress Status in linux-oem-5.14 source package in Impish: Invalid Status in linux-oem-5.17 source package in Impish: Invalid Status in linux source package in Jammy: In Progress Status in linux-oem-5.14 source package in Jammy: Invalid Status in linux-oem-5.17 source package in Jammy: In Progress Status in linux source package in Kinetic: In Progress Status in linux-oem-5.14 source package in Kinetic: Invalid Status in linux-oem-5.17 source package in Kinetic: Invalid Bug description: [Impact] test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh should not be failing anymore with patches submitted to fix it in bug 1871015 (unless it's a kernel config related issue). With the regression-testing result hinting system available, we should remove the SAUCE patches that mark "underlay in a VRF" test failure as an expected failure to catch regressions in the future. This could reduce maintenance cost as well. [Fix] Revert the following patches: * UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Make test for VXLAN underlay in non-default VRF an expected failure * UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Don't fail test_vxlan_under_vrf on xfail [Test] Patched test script tested with F/I/J/F-oem-5.14/J-oem-5.17. I have also modify the test case to fail it deliberately to verify this change, it works as expected. [Where problems could occur] Change limit to test cases, should not have any real impact to any kernel functions. We may see failures reported from this test in our SRU regression-testing report in the future, but it means we're doing the right thing. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1975691/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
