Have had no issues with the proposed kernel for over 24 hours, with 156
we had multiple issues daily

** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy-linux
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy-linux

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2126434

Title:
  [Regression Updates] System hangs when loading audit rules
  (5.15.0-156.166)

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [SRU Justification]

  == Impact ==
  Upstream stable v5.15.189 / CVE-2025-38465 added
    ae8f160e7eb2 ("netlink: Fix wraparounds of sk->sk_rmem_alloc.")
  which is reported to cause soft-lockups / hangs on boot when loading auditd 
rules.

  Message from syslogd@usw745 at Sep 26 12:45:22 ...
   kernel:[22208.861925] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#65 stuck for 26s! 
[kauditd:593]
  [22208.862003] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8e7f84c40000(0000) 
knlGS:0000000000000000
  [22208.862004] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [22208.862005] CR2: 00007f6c313b1110 CR3: 0000006fa5c30005 CR4: 
00000000007706e0
  [22208.862009] PKRU: 55555554
  [22208.862010] Call Trace:
  [22208.862012]  <TASK>
  [22208.862017]  ? wake_up_q+0x90/0x90
  [22208.862022]  netlink_unicast+0xb0/0x290
  [22208.862024]  kauditd_send_queue+0xb2/0x180

  == Fix ==
  This was fixed upstream with the following commit which is part of pending 
v5.15.190
    759dfc7d04ba netlink: avoid infinite retry looping in netlink_unicast()

  == Testcase ==
  Creating and loading auditd rules on boot (details TBD)

  == Regression Potential ==
  Anything related to netlink sockets.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2126434/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to