On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 10:13 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Lee-san, this is an additonal one..
> Not-tested-yet, just by review.

OK, I'll test this on my x86_64 platform, which doesn't seem to hit the
soft lockups.

> 
> Fixing page_lock() <-> zone->lock nesting of bad-behavior.
> 
> Before:
>       lock_page()(TestSetPageLocked())
>       spin_lock(zone->lock)
>       unlock_page()
>       spin_unlock(zone->lock)  

Couple of comments:
* I believe that the locks are acquired in the right order--at least as
documented in the comments in mm/rmap.c.  
* The unlocking appears out of order because this function attempts to
hold the zone lock across a few pages in the pagevec, but must switch to
a different zone lru lock when it finds a page on a different zone from
the zone whose lock it is holding--like in the pagevec draining
functions, altho' they don't need to lock the page.

> After:
>       spin_lock(zone->lock)
>       spin_unlock(zone->lock)

Right.  With your reworked check_move_unevictable_page() [with retry],
we don't need to lock the page here, any more.  That means we can revert
all of the changes to pass the mapping back to sys_shmctl() and move the
call to scan_mapping_unevictable_pages() back to shmem_lock() after
clearing the address_space's unevictable flag.  We only did that to
avoid sleeping while holding the shmem_inode_info lock and the
shmid_kernel's ipc_perm spinlock.  

Shall I handle that, after we've tested this patch?

> 
> Including nit-pick fix. (I'll ask Kosaki-san to merge this to his 5/5)
> 
> Hmm...
> 
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c |   25 +++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: test-2.6.26-rc5-mm3/mm/vmscan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- test-2.6.26-rc5-mm3.orig/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ test-2.6.26-rc5-mm3/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1106,7 +1106,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_lis
>               if (nr_taken == 0)
>                       goto done;
>  
> -             spin_lock(&zone->lru_lock);
> +             spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);

1) It appears that the spin_lock() [no '_irq'] was there because irqs
are disabled a few lines above so that we could use non-atomic
__count[_zone]_vm_events().  
2) I think this predates the split lru or unevictable lru patches, so
these changes are unrelated.
>               /*
>                * Put back any unfreeable pages.
>                */
> @@ -1136,9 +1136,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_lis
>                       }
>               }
>       } while (nr_scanned < max_scan);
> -     spin_unlock(&zone->lru_lock);
> +     spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
>  done:
> -     local_irq_enable();
>       pagevec_release(&pvec);
>       return nr_reclaimed;
>  }
> @@ -2438,7 +2437,7 @@ static void show_page_path(struct page *
>   */
>  static void check_move_unevictable_page(struct page *page, struct zone *zone)
>  {
> -
> +retry:
>       ClearPageUnevictable(page); /* for page_evictable() */
We can remove this comment            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
page_evictable() no longer asserts !PageUnevictable(), right?

>       if (page_evictable(page, NULL)) {
>               enum lru_list l = LRU_INACTIVE_ANON + page_is_file_cache(page);
> @@ -2455,6 +2454,8 @@ static void check_move_unevictable_page(
>                */
>               SetPageUnevictable(page);
>               list_move(&page->lru, &zone->lru[LRU_UNEVICTABLE].list);
> +             if (page_evictable(page, NULL))
> +                     goto retry;
>       }
>  }
>  
> @@ -2494,16 +2495,6 @@ void scan_mapping_unevictable_pages(stru
>                               next = page_index;
>                       next++;
>  
> -                     if (TestSetPageLocked(page)) {
> -                             /*
> -                              * OK, let's do it the hard way...
> -                              */
> -                             if (zone)
> -                                     spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> -                             zone = NULL;
> -                             lock_page(page);
> -                     }
> -
>                       if (pagezone != zone) {
>                               if (zone)
>                                       spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> @@ -2514,8 +2505,6 @@ void scan_mapping_unevictable_pages(stru
>                       if (PageLRU(page) && PageUnevictable(page))
>                               check_move_unevictable_page(page, zone);
>  
> -                     unlock_page(page);
> -
>               }
>               if (zone)
>                       spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> @@ -2551,15 +2540,11 @@ void scan_zone_unevictable_pages(struct 
>               for (scan = 0;  scan < batch_size; scan++) {
>                       struct page *page = lru_to_page(l_unevictable);
>  
> -                     if (TestSetPageLocked(page))
> -                             continue;
> -
>                       prefetchw_prev_lru_page(page, l_unevictable, flags);
>  
>                       if (likely(PageLRU(page) && PageUnevictable(page)))
>                               check_move_unevictable_page(page, zone);
>  
> -                     unlock_page(page);
>               }
>               spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
>  
> 

I'll let you know how it goes.

Later,
Lee

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to