On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:27:26AM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote: > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:17 AM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 02:59:12PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Vegard Nossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > What I don't get here is how SLUB can be used this early in the boot > >> > process. Notice that this is still miles away from the > >> > > >> > SLUB: Genslabs=12, HWalign=128, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=1, > >> > Nodes=1 > >> > > >> > line, which comes much later. And that kobject_init() _is_ calling > >> > kzalloc() via verify_dynamic_kobject_allocation(). Isn't this an > >> > error? > >> > > >> > (Unfortunately, my "git log" doesn't turn up any recent changes for > >> > any of the affected code paths here.) > >> > >> Ehe... and this is the reason why: The code was added by this patch: > >> > >> commit 0e3638d1e04040121af00195f7e4628078246489 > >> Author: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Date: Thu Mar 16 17:30:16 2006 -0800 > >> > >> warn when statically-allocated kobjects are used > >> > >> ..which only exists in -next. Is that just a truly ancient patch, or > >> did somebody forget to adjust their clock? > > > > It is truely a very old patch, that only lives in my tree, and currently > > isn't planned to go to Linus any year soon. > > > > But it has a very long history of living in the -mm tree, and finding > > real bugs, it's just not "safe" enough to go to Linus's tree. Unless > > you think it is? > > Hm. In this case, the patch is not even reporting a problem, it is in > fact in error itself. > > The problem is that it calls kzalloc() before the slab caches have > been set up. (Yes, it's a wonder that nothing crashed.) I can only > suggest the addendum > > if (!slab_is_available()) > return;
That's odd, what changed to cause this to become a problem? Is a kobject somehow now being created too early in the boot process than it was in the past? This code hasn't changed in a very long time, so I'm loath to blame this code, odds are the root cause is somewhere else... thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
