On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 08:10:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11254
> Subject : KVM: fix userspace ABI breakage
> Submitter : Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date : 21 Jul 2008 17:58:26 (0 days old)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/21/197
> Handled-By : Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/21/197
The discussion in Bugzilla whether it is a regression at all can be
condensed to the following question:
Can a struct that is part of the 2.6.26 userspace headers be defined to
be part of an "experimental ABI" and therefore be changed?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
