* Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12156
> Subject : v2.6.28-rc2: x86_32 relocation regression?
> Submitter : Vegard Nossum <[email protected]>
> Date : 2008-11-24 21:19 (27 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122756158220966&w=4
not really a regression but a long-standing inconvenience/bug of the debug
symbols of relocatable kernels. (ever since relocatable kernels were added
in '06 or so.) Nevertheless we queued up a revert of the defconfig change
for .29, to not expose it in the defconfig:
f269b07: x86: revert CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y defconfig change
so i think it can be taken off the regressions list.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
