* Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sunday 15 February 2009, Justin Madru wrote:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
> > > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12263
> > > Subject : Sata soft reset filling log
> > > Submitter : Justin Madru <[email protected]>
> > > Date : 2008-12-13 2:07 (64 days old)
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122913412608533&w=4
> >
> > I'm still seeing this on .29-rc5, and I think that my bug #12263 is a
> > duplicate of bug #12609,
> > or more correctly it's a duplicate of mine because I reported first.
> >
> > It seems like the bug has been fixed in tip/master for some time now.
> > Below is the diff of origin and tip from when I tested.
>
> Ingo, do you know whinch patch in -tip fixes this regression?
This one, done on Jan 10, more than a month ago:
f1d26da: Revert "libata: Add 32bit PIO support"
When a commit causes trouble in -tip qa i immediately revert it in 95%
of the cases, no questions asked. Especially if it's related to
persistent storage.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
