On Sunday 26 April 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13185 > > Subject : New x86 warning > > Submitter : Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> > > Date : 2009-04-22 6:46 (4 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124038280020950&w=4 > > I saw this warning with certain GCC versions for several kernel > cycles, so it's not any recent change that triggers this and it is > not a regression. > > GCC is simply wrong here - i have posted a workaround for that but > it is too ugly to be merged upstream. > > > Handled-By : Andi Kleen <[email protected]> > > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/19330/ > > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/19406/ > > This patch regresses on older GCC versions and doesnt really address > the GCC false positive warning either, it just removes the inline > function that triggers the warning.
OK, so this is not a kernel bug in fact. I'm going to close it. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
