On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> The code here is
> 
>         16:   48 8b 80 00 01 00 00    mov    0x100(%rax),%rax
>         1d:   48 8b 50 08             mov    0x8(%rax),%rdx
>         21:   48 85 d2                test   %rdx,%rdx
>         24:   74 11                   je     0x37
>         26:   49 8b 44 24 78          mov    0x78(%r12),%rax
>         2b:*  8b 80 84 00 00 00       mov    0x84(%rax),%eax     <-- trapping 
> instruction
>         31:   89 82 08 08 00 00       mov    %eax,0x808(%rdx)
>         37:   f6 45 a0 02             testb  $0x2,-0x60(%rbp)
> 
> and that "testb $0x2, -0x60(%rbp)" seems to be the
> 
>       if (iir & I915_USER_INTERRUPT) {

Yeah, that seems to be the right thing.

So the actual faulting instruction is from this:

                if (dev->primary->master) {
                        master_priv = dev->primary->master->driver_priv;
                        if (master_priv->sarea_priv)
                                master_priv->sarea_priv->last_dispatch =
                                        READ_BREADCRUMB(dev_priv);

and it looks like %rax starts out being 'dev', then the

        mov    0x100(%rax),%rax

means that %rax is now 'dev->primary', and then

        mov    0x8(%rax),%rdx

moves 'dev->primary->master' into %rdx. It's not zero, so we then do that 
READ_BREADCRUMB(dev_priv), which expands to

        READ_HWSP(dev_priv, I915_BREADCRUMB_INDEX)

which in turn is

        (((volatile u32*)(dev_priv->hw_status_page))[reg])

and it looks like dev_priv->hw_status_page is NULL.

You can verify this by looking at teh exception address:

        BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 
0000000000000084

and that '84' is I915_BREADCRUMB_INDEX*4 (0x21*4).

And the problem seems to be that we've cleared the hw_status_page pointer 
in i915_gem_cleanup_hws():

        dev_priv->hw_status_page = NULL;

and we did that in 

  i915_gem_idle() ->
    i915_gem_cleanup_ringbuffer() ->
      i915_gem_cleanup_hws()

so now since interrupts are still enabled, you'll get a NULL pointer 
dereference.

I think my patch is correct.

                Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to