Hi Mel,

I have no done additional tests ... and can report the following

Thursday Mel Gorman wrote:

>   1/5 page allocator: Always wake kswapd when restarting an allocation 
> attempt after direct reclaim failed
>   2/5 page allocator: Do not allow interrupts to use ALLOC_HARDER
>
>
>       These patches correct problems introduced by me during the 2.6.31-rc1
>       merge window. The patches were not meant to introduce any functional
>       changes but two were missed.
>
>       If your problem goes away with just these two patches applied,
>       please tell me.

1+2 do not help

> Test 3: If you are getting allocation failures, try with the following patch
>
>   3/5 vmscan: Force kswapd to take notice faster when high-order watermarks 
> are being hit
>
>       This is a functional change that causes kswapd to notice sooner
>       when high-order watermarks have been hit. There have been a number
>       of changes in page reclaim since 2.6.30 that might have delayed
>       when kswapd kicks in for higher orders
>
>       If your problem goes away with these three patches applied, please
>       tell me

1+2+3 do not help either

> Test 4: If you are still getting failures, apply the following
>   4/5 page allocator: Pre-emptively wake kswapd when high-order watermarks 
> are hit
>
>       This patch is very heavy handed and pre-emptively kicks kswapd when
>       watermarks are hit. It should only be necessary if there has been
>       significant changes in the timing and density of page allocations
>       from an unknown source. Tobias, this patch is largely aimed at you.
>       You reported that with patches 3+4 applied that your problems went
>       away. I need to know if patch 3 on its own is enough or if both
>       are required
>
>       If your problem goes away with these four patches applied, please
>       tell me

3 allone does not help
3+4 does ...

cheers
tobi
-- 
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland
http://it.oetiker.ch [email protected] ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to