On Saturday 31 October 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sat, 31 Oct 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > The patch is appended, please have a look. > > Looks sane to me. It does the actual real socket ops early, and does the > crazy pcmcia resume late. > > And I like how you abstracted out that dev->socket thing in > pcmcia_socket_dev_run(). > > The only thing that looks odd is how you do "socket_start_resume()" in the > "late_resume" path too - that has already been done by the early_resume, > and as far as I can see you're now initializing the socket twice. > > Is there a reason for that? Or am I misreading the patch (I didn't > actually apply it, I just read the patch itself).
Yes, there is, because socket_early_resume() only does it in the (skt->state & SOCKET_PRESENT) case. If that bit is not set, the initialization is entirely postponed. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
