On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:28:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki ([email protected]) > wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14894 > > Subject : pohmelfs: NULL pointer dereference > > Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <[email protected]> > > Date : 2009-12-02 1:11 (28 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125971633107940&w=4 > > Handled-By : Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]> > > Yes, I saw this regression and there is a patch to handle this, but it > kind of disables sync at all. Jens Axboe, who introduced per-bdi > writeback patches, did not yet reply.
Well, Jens, what's your opinion about that? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
