On Monday 08 February 2010, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > W dniu 8 lutego 2010 11:56 użytkownik Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl> > napisał: > > On Monday 08 February 2010, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > >> 2010/2/8 Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl>: > >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > >> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. > >> > > >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > >> > introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should > >> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > >> > > >> > > >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15096 > >> > Subject : Resume lock up -- bisected, commit > >> > 3a1151e3f124fd1a2c54b8153f510f1a7c715369 > >> > Submitter : Rafał Miłecki <zaj...@gmail.com> > >> > Date : 2010-01-20 23:15 (19 days old) > >> > First-Bad-Commit: > >> > http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/3a1151e3f124fd1a2c54b8153f510f1a7c715369 > > > > It looks like we should revert this commit, seems broken. > > > > Anyway, I'll do my best to have a look at this bug later today. > > In such case I'd prefer to add "broken_DOS" flag for devices that were > enabled by this patch. We could avoid restoring backlight on resume > for broken_DOS then and maybe just update brightness to current value.
Or perhaps we can try to restore the backlight at a different place. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
