This has been addressed by moving the per node information into a
different cacheline.

On Sun, 13 Jun 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry     : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713
> Subject               : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
> Submitter     : Alex Shi <[email protected]>
> Date          : 2010-03-25 8:40 (81 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: 
> http://git.kernel.org/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864
> Message-ID    : <[email protected]>
> References    : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4
> Handled-By    : Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
>                 Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to