On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:12:43 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 01:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16399 > > Subject : perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc > > Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin > > <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/[email protected]> > > Date : 2010-07-13 8:14 (48 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: > > http://git.kernel.org/linus/1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15 > > Message-ID : > > <1279008849.2096.913.camel-sz7BYL/Y5Hu/P+R7jlPCFVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127900880212470&w=2 > > > > > > Should be fixed by: > > commit 351af0725e5222e35741011d1ea62215c1ed06db > Author: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/[email protected]> > Date: Fri Aug 6 13:39:08 2010 +0800 > > perf, x86: Fix Intel-nhm PMU programming errata workaround > > Thx, closed. Cheers, Flo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
