:
:-On [20050826 14:46], Hiten Pandya ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
:>Jeroen, that would be a good thing. Given the complexity of the Selective
:>Acknowledgement and its cousins, e.g. T-SACK, etc; it should definitely go
:>into a separate manual page.
:
:*nods*
:
:Definitely. SACK is a realm unto itself. And to overload tcp(4) with it
:might be a bit overdone. This way people looking for sack related stuff can
:immediately go to sack(4) and those who look for it in tcp(4) will find the
:reference easily.
:
:--
:Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)wxs.nl> / asmodai / kita no mono
Urrm. The SACK implementation is specific to the protocol. The
options should be left in tcp(4). If someone wants to write a separate,
more complete manual page just on SACK, then a sack(4) manual page is
fine. But basic documentation for the options belongs in tcp(4).
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
