Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: <cut>
This, however, leaves us with an awkward name. Pc32 for x86_64? The pc32 name always seemed wrong. How about calling it "ibm-pc"? After all, that's the basic architecture, since almost 20 years. Actually, the more I think about it, the more it makes sense it me.
<cut>+1, This does make more sense then pc32, after all it has been all about being compatible to IBM, in the early years that is, indeed now 25 years ago :-).
-- mph
