> There is a /dev/fd directory for when /dev/fd isn't mounted which > duplicates some of the functionality, it may be enough for spamd. > > I will take a look at /dev/fd and see if there are any obvious > bugs.
Im kind of confused as to why there is need to mount the fdesc filesystem into /dev/fd dirctory. Contents of /dev/fd are: [elevator] /dev% ls /dev/fd 0 15 21 28 34 40 47 53 6 9 1 16 22 29 35 41 48 54 60 10 17 23 3 36 42 49 55 61 11 18 24 30 37 43 5 56 62 12 19 25 31 38 44 50 57 63 13 2 26 32 39 45 51 58 7 14 20 27 33 4 46 52 59 8 and when i do mount -t fdesc fdesc /dev/fd, its the same as above except theres devices from 0 to 5 only. Btw, i meant the first patch applied to kern_syscalls.c. Can you MFC the already committed patch to -RELEASE too? Thanks, Petr
