:I might be wrong (and have misunderstood your reply) but I think he
:asked whether it would be possible to disallow a user to access the
:historical data (even if it is present on the disk). As I have not
:studied the code I might be wrong, but should it not be quite easy to
:create some switch which determines whether a @@0x<timestamp> will be
:treated as a normal filename or the name or not?
:
:--
:Erik Wikström
Yes, that would be a simple mount flag to tell HAMMER to only allow
the @@ extension for the superuser. The default could be to only allow
@@ for root or for files owned by the user in question.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
