On Sat, May 17, 2008 3:42 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote: > The point here is that one would then be able to have, say, /var, but > then make each directory under /var a filesystem-within-a-filesystem > and replicate them independantly. One might then decide to replicate > /var/db but not /var/log, putting the redundancy and parallelism where > its needing rather then having to use a big-stick approach.
Would this be possible to convert after time of creation? e.g. /var is one filesystem, but then 6 months later you realize you only need /var/db - can /var/db then be "filesystemized"? >From a user interface point of view, I'd rather people didn't have to second-guess their file system layout just to take advantage of HAMMER features down the road.
