On Sat, June 7, 2008 9:04 pm, Dan M wrote: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> nullmailer: bad license >> qmail: until very recently no license at all >> postfix: different goal. > > I disagree about your comment on qmail's code, but I won't go into > flame wars. In any case I gotcha. >
I will point out that there was some pretty good discussion on these mailing lists and on IRC about the reasons for DMA when corecode started working on it. I was of the opinion that it was reinventing the wheel, and was probably a total irritant for corecode in the process. I've come around to the idea, though - I like the idea of a simple, BSD-licensed mailer. It's also not really useful to in an open source project saying, "No, don't work on a part of the project that makes you excited!"
