On Tuesday 10 June 2008, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> On 6/10/08, Aggelos Economopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > But before I update all callees to remove copy{in,out}(), does
> > anybody have
> > > > any objections? Also, what should be the value of XXX? Perhaps
> > ctloutput
> > > > belongs to pr_usrreqs...
> > >
> > > I don't think above change is enough. You need to change
> > > sooptcopy{in,out}() or at least set sopt->sopt_td to NULL. Please
> > > take a look at ip_ctloutput() for what the above patch may break.
> >
> >
> > Yes, I know. I'm in the middle of updating the callees. This is how I'm
> > doing
> > it:
>
> Ah, I see. Sorry, I misread the previous mail. I think you could use
> -1 in soport()
Any unused value would do, right? Isn't this a hint that we should just move
pr_ctloutput to pru_ctloutput and add a PRU_CTLOUTPUT value?
Aggelos
