On Sat, February 28, 2009 5:35 am, Alex Hornung wrote: > - Dividing policies into first order (fair share, anticipatory, ...) and > second order (bandwidth limiter, ...)
Should we establish how many policies we'd actually need? The first-order items described seem mutually exclusive, and a bandwidth limiter (which is a good idea) is the only one so far at the second order. I'm thinking that what Simon suggested about just having a single scheduler may work just fine because there aren't enough modular items to really require the extra work of extra scheduler 'layers'.
