On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:28:52 +0300
Hasso Tepper <ha...@estpak.ee> wrote:
> Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> > Coming late to the party here - but wouldn't these links be better
> > pointed to libthread_xu which has been standard for quite some time
> > now.
>
> Yes, libc_r is there for testing purpose only nowadays. But that's not
> the excuse to be broken. Especially while taking account that we don't
> (maybe we should?) adjust libpthread.so.0 symlink while upgrading.
I got caught a few weeks ago by coredumps in flwm and synergyc with
libc_r (the packages had been built on a box with libthread_xu and
installed on one that still had libc_r linked). I'd be happy to see the
links switched during upgrade.
> Anyway, the problem with libc_r should be fixed now as well.
Is there really any point in keeping libc_r around anymore.
--
Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays
C:>WIN | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see
You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/
