On 18 okt 2011, at 18.09, Alex Hornung wrote: > ... > In a summary: 2.12 is broken and the fixes for it need plenty of testing > (months of testing). > > There are a few solutions that have been proposed for this, and I'd like > people to vote on them, since we really need to make a decision ASAP: > ... > D) Release the broken 2.12 and let users "suck it up".
I wote D). 2.10 is simply too old to make sense, and I don't think 2.12 is in that bad shape. My single CPU x86_64 fileserver runs fine. Later we would release an early 3.0 when things have stabilize, sure to be better than the older release :-) Max
