2011/11/22 Francois Tigeot <ftig...@wolfpond.org>: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 09:53:05AM +0100, joris dedieu wrote: >> 2011/11/22 Francois Tigeot <ftig...@wolfpond.org>: >> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:06:28AM +0530, Siju George wrote: >> >> >> >> Why did you use Scientific Linux and not some popular distro like >> >> Debian/Ubuntu/CentOS/Suse/Slackware etc? >> >> Scientific Linux is bare clone of RHEL. > > I'll say Centos is the bare clone. > > SL at least adds many scientific software packages which are not present > in the original RHEL version.
You may be right. What I mean here, is that you'll have the same results using centos or RHEL. Joris > > -- > Francois Tigeot >