On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 12:46:29AM -0500, Justin Sherrill wrote: > > In the long term, I'd like to have DragonFly known as a server > operating system. Being a BSD platform and trying to catch up on all > the different desktop enviroments is worthwhile, but we don't have the > resources to do it better than, say, Canonical, so it's not worth > having it as our focus.
Desktop support is also mainly a pkgsrc issue. IMHO, the only worthwile thing we could do on this front is replacing the current USB stack. -- Francois Tigeot
