Hello, Francois Tigeot <ftig...@wolfpond.org> wrote: > I took advantage of an available dual-Xeon box to do some scalability > benchmarking. > > <...> > > Results with graphs are in the attached PDF file. > > Some rapid conclusions: > - Scientific Linux smokes all other operating systems > - DragonFly and FreeBSD performance is mostly the same, FreeBSD degrades > faster under high loads > - NetBSD has trouble handling high numbers of database clients but still > manages to scale when numbers are low > - Keeping processes on the same location they last ran on increases > performance by a few percents
Would you be able to try using local UNIX socket? NetBSD should have nearly linear scalability, unless there is some regression. Going through 127.0.0.1 is what kills us, I believe. Thanks. -- Mindaugas
