On 21 okt 2012, at 11.53, John Marino wrote: > On 10/21/2012 11:40, Max Herrgard wrote: >> On 21 okt 2012, at 04.41, Justin Sherrill wrote: >>> I don't want to >>> hold up the release for packages; it's just too finicky. Anyone have >>> a problem with releasing without binary packages available? >> Hrm yeah I think we should hold it until packages are ready. What can it be? >> A few days more? > Waiting until the packages are done only penalizes people that build packages > from source. I don't see anything wrong with cutting a release along with a > promise to have packages uploaded within 2-4 days. The users that want to > wait can and the users that don't won't need to.
Well, as a source builder myself I've already checked out the 3.2 branch and built it together with pkgsrc source packages. The typical release iso usage for me is when I need something quick that I know is working. Binary packages included. Max
